Wednesday, November 2, 2016

True Spiritual Fasting

(This message was preached at Heritage Baptist Church on Wed. eve, 11-2-16: http://www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?sermonID=112162048515

THESIS: To give us a Scriptural understanding of fasting, and how it is a benefit to our lives as Christians.

18 And the disciples of John and of the Pharisees used to fast: and they come and say unto him, Why do the disciples of John and of the Pharisees fast, but thy disciples fast not?  19 And Jesus said unto them, Can the children of the bridechamber fast, while the bridegroom is with them? as long as they have the bridegroom with them, they cannot fast.  20 But the days will come, when the bridegroom shall be taken away from them, and then shall they fast in those days. 

Here we have a question posed to our Lord about a practice that is not so well understood today.  Back in the early 90’s I recall a Christian ministry which promoted a formal 40 day fast.  I remember thinking – 40 Days!  I could never do that.  Yet this ministry did present the question to me.  What is fasting? Should Christians do so today?  What is the reason to do it?  If you do a google search on it there are literally 12 million results!  Of course it is popular today to consider it in a medical or physiological manner – but the question before us is not physical, it is a highly spiritual one.  My goal is to give us a Scriptural understanding of fasting, and having done that, determine if and when it is right for us to do so. 

There are about 76 verses, or better – 40 passages in the whole Bible which explicitly refer to fasting.  Pretty slim pickings if you ask me. Less than ¼ of 1 percent of the Bible directly uses one of the 4 biblical words for fasting. Further – explicit teaching on fasting occurs in only 2 places.  That’s simply amazing folks!  If you were to listen to the spiritual gurus of the day – one might think there are whole books in the Bible given over to it.  Nothing in the Law of Moses speaks explicitly to fasting – but there is allusion to it in Leviticus and Numbers.  And the 2 places we do have explicit teaching are not all that well rounded or full.

What do we read?  In our passage today in Mark (and its parallels) Christ is responding to a question.  In the answer we learn only this, that it is assumed as a normal action for a disciple, and that we will do it (when the Lord is not here).  Nothing to tell us why or how or what.  In the Sermon on the Mount we read the only significant instruction on fasting which is explicit in nature. Matt 6:16-19 says, “Moreover when ye fast, be not as the hypocrites, of a sad countenance: for they disfigure their faces, that they may appear unto men to fast. Verily I say unto you, They have their reward. 17 But thou, when thou fastest, anoint thine head, and wash thy face; 18 that thou appear not unto men to fast, but unto thy Father which is in secret: and thy Father, which seeth in secret, shall reward thee openly.[1] 

We do not learn why we fast in this verse – only that our motivation should be heavenly – to please the Lord.  We do not fast to gain a reward from men – or if we do, we should not expect anything of the Lord in respect of our effort.  We also learn that there is an apparent reward.  But what is that reward?  We are not plainly told here. 

The other explicit teaching is found in 1 Corinthians where Paul is instructing husbands and wives. “Do not deprive one another except with consent for a time, that you may give yourselves to fasting and prayer; and come together again so that Satan does not tempt you because of your lack of self-control[2] Here we get just one small bit of positive instruction – we ought to give ourselves to fasting and prayer on occasion.  We are again not given a reason to do so. 

We have to answer the question of what it is, and why we do it, from examples throughout Scripture.  First of all, Fasting is tied to prayer and humility, and seems to be oriented toward a specified goal.  There are many examples of this.  We see this in Psa. 35:13, 69:10; Neh. 1:4, 9:1; Est. 4:3, 16; Dan 9:3; Jonah 3:5-10; and Luke 2:37.  Psalm 35:13 reads, “But as for me, when they were sick, my clothing was sackcloth: I humbled my soul with fasting; And my prayer returned into mine own bosom.”[3] Oftentimes we read of the affliction of soul and body in the Scripture.  The Jews seemed to associate fasting with affliction, and especially, the Day of Atonement.  We read in Lev. 16:29, “And this shall be a statute for ever unto you: that in the seventh month, on the tenth day of the month, ye shall afflict your souls, and do no work at all, whether it be one of your own country, or a stranger that sojourneth among you[4] But you say it never says fasting in that verse.  That’s true, but later in Acts 27:9 a reference to ‘the Fast’ is used to reference the season of year it was – when Paul and his sailing companions were shipwrecked.  Clearly we are to see the Jews made affliction of soul equivalent to fasting. 

The account of David in 2 Samuel 12 is one of the better examples of fasting and its use in the Bible.  Please turn to 2 Samuel 12:15,

And Nathan departed unto his house. And the Lord struck the child that Uriah’s wife bare unto David, and it was very sick.  16 David therefore besought God for the child; and David fasted, and went in, and lay all night upon the earth.  17 And the elders of his house arose, and went to him, to raise him up from the earth: but he would not, neither did he eat bread with them.  18 And it came to pass on the seventh day, that the child died. And the servants of David feared to tell him that the child was dead: for they said, Behold, while the child was yet alive, we spake unto him, and he would not hearken unto our voice: how will he then vex himself, if we tell him that the child is dead?  19 But when David saw that his servants whispered, David perceived that the child was dead: therefore David said unto his servants, Is the child dead? And they said, He is dead.  20 Then David arose from the earth, and washed, and anointed himself, and changed his apparel, and came into the house of the Lord, and worshipped: then he came to his own house; and when he required, they set bread before him, and he did eat.  21 Then said his servants unto him, What thing is this that thou hast done? thou didst fast and weep for the child, while it was alive; but when the child was dead, thou didst rise and eat bread.  22 And he said, While the child was yet alive, I fasted and wept: for I said, Who can tell whether God will be gracious to me, that the child may live?  23 But now he is dead, wherefore should I fast? can I bring him back again? I shall go to him, but he shall not return to me.

What do we learn from David’s actions and explanation?  First of all, his fasting was directly related to his petition, we read that he besought God for the child; and David fasted, and went in, and lay all night upon the earth.  Note his posture – he was laid out on the earth. This is a position of humility.  David did not lay down upon his bed.  Have you ever laid down on the floor – even if it is carpeted, it is not so comfortable? 

Secondly – notice that the elders of the house were not told of his fasting.  They went in to arouse him from apparent sleep, but he wouldn’t come.  That’s how they discovered he was fasting.  And he did this for 7 days!  The whole time that his child was still alive – David ate nothing, but brought himself low before the earth and prayed.  When the child died – they feared to tell him, because they didn’t understand the nature of his fast.  Listen to this in verse 18b, Behold, while the child was yet alive, we spake unto him, and he would not hearken unto our voice: how will he then vex himself, if we tell him that the child is dead? They assumed the worst! Maybe David would take his own life?!  They did not grasp the purpose for David’s fast. 

Our 3rd lesson is just that, David had a very specific purpose in his fast, and we have the record of that purpose in the account before us.  Hear David’s words, “While the child was yet alive, I fasted and wept: for I said, Who can tell whether God will be gracious to me, that the child may live?  23 But now he is dead, wherefore should I fast? can I bring him back again? I shall go to him, but he shall not return to me.” His purpose was that the child might live.  And since the child did not live we learn a further lesson – our fasting is not a guarantee that we will get what we desire!  And David’s response was not a fatalistic one.  He still honored God.  The fact that he did not respond in a negative manner proves this.  He washed his face, anointed himself and worshipped God!  Then he ate. 

Turn to Isaiah 58 and we will hear from the Lord what he thinks of hypocritical fasting.  From verses 2 through 7 we read specifically of God’s opinion on Israel’s fasting.  Please let me read this from the ESV,

Yet they seek me daily and delight to know my ways, as if they were a nation that did righteousness and did not forsake the judgment of their God; they ask of me righteous judgments; they delight to draw near to God.

‘Why have we fasted, and you see it not? Why have we humbled ourselves, and you take no knowledge of it?’

Behold, in the day of your fast you seek your own pleasure, and oppress all your workers.

Behold, you fast only to quarrel and to fight and to hit with a wicked fist.

Fasting like yours this day will not make your voice to be heard on high.

Is such the fast that I choose, a day for a person to humble himself?

Is it to bow down his head like a reed, and to spread sackcloth and ashes under him? Will you call this a fast, and a day acceptable to the Lord?

“Is not this the fast that I choose: to loose the bonds of wickedness,

to undo the straps of the yoke, to let the oppressed go free, and to break every yoke?

Is it not to share your bread with the hungry and bring the homeless poor into your house; when you see the naked, to cover him, and not to hide yourself from your own flesh?”[5]

What we just heard is very important.  We see that fasting, as a practice, with no desire to do right, avails us nothing.  Verse 3 is extremely presumptive, don’t you think?  ‘Why have we fasted, and you see it not? Why have we humbled ourselves, and you take no knowledge of it?’ Beloved – do you see how quickly we can revert to a works based righteousness?!  The people did fast.  They did afflict and humble themselves – God never questions the act itself.  What He does, is question the heart behind the affliction.  These people were not a people who did righteousness and turned away the judgment of their God.  Instead, they aroused it against them! 

We read of a similar account in Zec 7:5 – God calling out the people for letting their fasts become meaningless and meritorious for 70 years! 

Humility is hard work.  Not only is the physical act of withholding food physically weakening – the act of spiritually rehearsing your sin and the sin of those in your charge is wearying.  Pleading before the King is not a small matter. But that is exact place He wants you to be! Remember how Esther approached the King? To our view, it might appear presumptive to approach the throne-room uninvited.  Yet she did prepare.  We read in Esther 4:16, “Go, gather together all the Jews that are present in Shushan, and fast ye for me, and neither eat nor drink three days, night or day; I also and my maidens will fast likewise; and so will I go in unto the king, which is not according to the law: and if I perish, I perish!”[6]

Real humility recognizes the place of men before a sovereign God.  Are you prepared to sacrifice like this – humbling yourself before a God who may turn away from your request?  David did.  He looked to this God – One who owed him nothing, and trusted that perhaps He would hear his prayer.  And when God’s answer was in the negative, he did not question God like the people in Isa. 58 did. 

I think the reason David’s response was so good, was he was under the conviction even yet, for his sin.  It was less than a year since the evil had passed between him and Bathsheba. 

When Daniel prayed in Daniel chapter 9:3 we read that his prayer was with sackcloth and ashes and fasting.  In Daniel 10:2 we read that he had went three weeks without pleasant food, wine or meat and was in mourning. Later in verse 12 – 13a we read that his effort was indeed rewarded: “Do not fear, Daniel, for from the first day that you set your heart to understand, and to humble yourself before your God, your words were heard; and I have come because of your words. 13 But the prince of the kingdom of Persia withstood me twenty-one days…[7]

We ought never think that our effort – even extreme effort – is of some meritorious nature.  But done rightly, that is to say, in secret, with the glory of the Lord in high regard, it does indeed please our Lord.  The question is, are you seeking the Lord’s will, or seeking to impose upon Him, your will?

We read of another angelic report in Acts 10:30. Listen to the angel speaking to Cornelius, “Your prayers and your alms have come up for a memorial before God.”[8] Have you thought about how your prayers are a sweet smelling savor to the Lord?  Perhaps if we kept that mindset, when we pray, we might actually pray with a greater fervency!

Also fasting is a sanctifying grace.  Listen to Joel 2:12-16,

Therefore also now, saith the Lord, turn ye even to me with all your heart, and with fasting, and with weeping, and with mourning:

13and rend your heart, and not your garments, and turn unto the Lord your God: for he is gracious and merciful, slow to anger, and of great kindness, and repenteth him of the evil.

14Who knoweth if he will return and repent, and leave a blessing behind him; even a meat offering and a drink offering unto the Lord your God?

15Blow the trumpet in Zion, sanctify a fast, call a solemn assembly:

16gather the people, sanctify the congregation, assemble the elders, gather the children, and those that suck the breasts: let the bridegroom go forth of his chamber, and the bride out of her closet.” 

Verse 13 tells us to rend our hearts and isn’t this a sanctifying act?  We should keep our hearts tender toward the Lord, and one way to do it is by the humbling of fasting before our God.

Many of your know that I attend a weekday Bible study and a few weeks ago a brother in the Lord, Carlos, gave testimony of God’s goodness to him in helping his family through a great crisis with his newborn daughter.  And he had brought the wife and baby, as well as his mother along to do so.  Carlos is a relatively new believer, and he is growing like crazy.  Such testimony is always a great thing for us to hear.  But I enjoyed the testimony of his mother and how she prayed for him for 13 years, during his rebellion. 

A couple weeks later I went over to him to tell him how much I appreciated his mother’s testimony, and he told me that she set aside Wednesday as a day of fasting for her son’s sake.  And that it was very hard.  He told me that in the beginning she would fast, and those were often the very days he would be arrested, or have some other crisis occur.  Yet she persisted, and he is very thankful today for this persistent mother. 

Did you notice how she never told any of us that she had fasted those 13 years? We were told only that she prayed for him. I only found out through Carlos later.  This is a true act of Spiritual fasting, and I contend, look at my brother Carlos, who is here today because of the grace of God in that work.

So let’s consider the question given to the Lord on why his disciples did not fast.  The Pharisee’s did it and taught their disciples to do so.  John and his disciples did it.  So what does Christ mean when he tells us that while the bridegroom was with them they could not fast?  The simple answer is that He – being the bridegroom – was in their presence.  And he did end up leaving them, for the 3 days in the ground.  They certainly mourned and fasted and grieved like no other time!  But how does this instruct us today?  Is our Lord, being in the throne-room of God no longer with us – and therefore we should fast?  Well that is a bit of a trick question!  Of course our Lord is with us, through the Word and through the Spirit, but we really ought to avail ourselves of prayer and fasting.  The Book of Acts has the most New Testament accounts of fasting and that by itself is instructive since we are New Testament believers.

I’d like to address the one significant theological matter.  We’ve looked at what the explicit commands regarding fasting are in Matt. 6:16-18, and 1 Cor. 7:5.  We are to give ourselves to fasting at times, and that we really ought to keep this a matter of privacy.  And this secrecy isn’t simply because our Lord said so.  That would be enough – but I want to give you some further reasons to fast, and to do so in secret.

When Christ answered the question posed, he did so, by referencing the Bridegroom – i.e. himself.  But this begs the question, who is the bride?  And we all in this congregation know immediately that it is the church.  We are the bride of Christ, and we ought to be keeping our lamps full of oil, in preparation for his return.  And serious matters between husband and wife ought to be handled in secret.  Not only that – but it ought to be the case that we do give ourselves to prayer and fasting since that is one significant way we can be close to our husband. 

But brethren – how does fasting impact our relation to the Lord? 

I’d like to bring one further historical case before you – the case of Hannah and Elkanah in 1 Sam. 1:4-19.  We don’t really have time to read the entire matter – but let me paraphrase the backdrop.  Elkanah had 2 wives – Peninnah & Hannah.  Elkanah made yearly trips to Shiloh to worship and sacrifice to the Lord, and because he favored Hannah, he gave her a double portion of the offering which he brought for sacrifice – he did this even though Hannah was barren and Peninnah had both sons & daughters.  So – as you might imagine Peninnah was jealous.  We’ll pick up the account in verse 7, “And as he did so year by year, when she went up to the house of the Lord, so she (Peninnah) provoked her (Hannah); therefore she wept, and did not eat.”[9] Jump to verse 10, “And she was in bitterness of soul, and prayed unto the Lord, and wept sore.”[10] Finally to verse 17, “Then Eli answered and said, Go in peace: and the God of Israel grant thee thy petition that thou hast asked of him. 18 And she said, Let thine handmaid find grace in thy sight. So the woman went her way, and did eat, and her countenance was no more sad.  19 And they rose up in the morning early, and worshipped before the Lord, and returned, and came to their house to Ramah: and Elkanah knew Hannah his wife; and the Lord remembered her.”[11]  In this account we see affliction of soul – but we also see a trust in the answer – we are told that BEFORE she knew if the answer was positive she was no longer sad.  She worshipped the Lord (v. 19).  Folks, it takes a special kind of relationship with the Lord to no longer be sad – even though the answer had not yet been disclosed.  The kind of relationship between a husband and wife.  Do you have a confidence that the Lord really DOES have your best interests and those of your loved ones, in mind?

When the woman of Samaria was confronted by Christ she tried to deflect her sin by bringing up the question of the place of true worship.  The place is not the central matter according to Christ – but rather the manner of approach.  We read in John 4, “But the hour cometh, and now is, when the true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit and in truth: for the Father seeketh such to worship him. 24 God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth.[12] 

True worship of God, spiritual worship of God, may sometime require fasting.  Such affliction demonstrates to yourself (not the Lord – he knows already) that you really are serious about the matter you have before you.  It also testifies in heaven before the angels of God (and the demons) that God is worthy.  Which by the way, is one of the definitions of worship – the worthiness of our God.  Are you willing to bring the matter before the Lord – in secret – that the Father may be glorified and will you be willing to accept even a negative answer – despite the affliction of soul you put yourself under?  This is evident love for God which the world does not understand. 

Folks – we are not given an explicit command to fast on a regular basis – but we are told we ought to give ourselves to it, should a serious matter arise.  What are matters serious enough to fast?  I will leave that to you – Hanna did so for a child, so did King David.  Perhaps the salvation of a loved one, as my brother Carlos’ mother thought. 

Are you troubled about some matter?  Bring it before the King!  Are we not told that all things work together for good to them that love God, to them who are the called according to his purpose?[13]  Trust the promise because it is given upon the ground of a loving relationship with an all-powerful, all loving God who cares for your soul.  Be willing to afflict yourselves when serious matters arise – that He might have the glory – and perchance, as David reasoned, he might hear and grant your petition – because he is so good!

Next time I preach Lord willing we’ll take up the matter of new cloth and new wine.

Amen




[1] The Cambridge Paragraph Bible: Of the Authorized English Version (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1873), Mt 6:16–18.
[2] The New King James Version (Nashville: Thomas Nelson, 1982), 1 Co 7:5.
[3] The Cambridge Paragraph Bible: Of the Authorized English Version (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1873), Ps 35:13.
[4] The Cambridge Paragraph Bible: Of the Authorized English Version (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1873), Le 16:29.
[5] The Holy Bible: English Standard Version (Wheaton: Standard Bible Society, 2016), Is 58:2–7.
[6] The Cambridge Paragraph Bible: Of the Authorized English Version (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1873), Es 4:16.
[7] The New King James Version (Nashville: Thomas Nelson, 1982), Da 10:12–13.
[8] The New King James Version (Nashville: Thomas Nelson, 1982), Ac 10:30.
 
[9] The Cambridge Paragraph Bible: Of the Authorized English Version (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1873), 1 Sa 1:7.
[10] The Cambridge Paragraph Bible: Of the Authorized English Version (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1873), 1 Sa 1:10.
[11] The Cambridge Paragraph Bible: Of the Authorized English Version (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1873), 1 Sa 1:17–20.
[12] The Cambridge Paragraph Bible: Of the Authorized English Version (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1873), Jn 4:23–24.
[13] The Cambridge Paragraph Bible: Of the Authorized English Version (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1873), Ro 8:28.

Thursday, September 15, 2016

The kingdom of God is in your midst!


Luke 17:20-30

When we pray and consider the Lord's Prayer we often do not think about, “Thy kingdom come, Thy will be done, on earth as it is in heaven.” (Matt. 6:10)

Yet in a very real sense this one calls to mind the very subject which the Pharisees were asking about (Luke 17:20).  They asked when it would come – but his answer is not simple – for the kingdom is manifold. In the Lord's Prayer we pray “on Earth as it is in heaven” so it is clear that the Kingdom spans many dimensions, and that what we see of the Kingdom on earth, is not what we see of the Kingdom in heaven.  The Kingdom of God in Heaven may be seen in Isaiah's call to the ministry in Isa. 6:1-7, or in John's description of heaven in Rev. 4:2-11, Paul's comments in Col 3:1-7, and Ezekiel's comments in Eze. 28:24-26.

Christ answer is for Earth and yet such is not of earth – for the kingdom of God is Heavenly and not essentially earthly.  What does the Kingdom of God on Earth look like today?  Look at the way Christ speaks to Nicodemas in John 3:1-8.  Unless one is born again, it cannot even be seen! But it's effects are seen. Nevertheless - it is a real kingdom and when it has been brought into it's fullness on earth it may indeed be seen.  But for now, the Pharisees were misguided in their attempt to 'see' or recognize the Kingdom now, apart from the Spirit.

There is another matter to consider.  To use earthly means (i.e. political power) to achieve Heavenly ends is misguided at best, malevolent at worst (A government which thinks it is doing moral good for its people, forces its will on them all the more.).  This is a great error, which is seen in groups such as the AFA and the Moral Majority.  Perhaps with good intent they use pragmatic means to achieve heavenly results... This can never be!   

Christ's answer is that those earthly signs which preceded his kingdom are sudden, bright, and powerfully effective. No earthly political uprising – even a coup, is like the Kingdom of God!!

And until we get that thought out of our heads, we will suffer bad thinking that somehow this or that earthly power is the Enemy – or the Savior.  The Savior already completed his work; it is finished (John 19:30). Have you availed to the blood of the lamb for your sins? There, I say, is the kingdom of God. Today it is in converted lives. But make no mistake – when the fullness of time came God sent forth his son born of a woman, born under the law (Gal 4:4), and he will send him once again in power with his mighty angels. (2 Thes. 1:7) Will you be part of His kingdom while in this earthly world of sin? If not now you will not be counted as part of the Kingdom then.

May the Lord grant us understanding and an entrance to the kingdom while it is still day (II Cor. 6:1-2) for night is coming (Heb. 3:12-14)…

Thursday, September 8, 2016

The Conversion of a Sinner

(This message was preached Wed eve, September 7th, 2016 at Heritage Baptist Church: http://tinysa.com/sermon/97162215327 )

THESIS: To describe a real sinners’ conversion and use that description to help the church to identify the people and places they should be working in evangelistically.

Good Evening!
Tonight I would like to look at Mark 2:13-17.  Please follow along as I read, “And he went forth again by the sea side; and all the multitude resorted unto him, and he taught them. And as he passed by, he saw Levi the son of Alpheus sitting at the receipt of custom, and said unto him, Follow me. And he arose and followed him. And it came to pass, that as Jesus sat at meat in his house, many publicans and sinners sat also together with Jesus and his disciples: for there were many, and they followed him. And when the scribes and Pharisees saw him eat with publicans and sinners, they said unto his disciples, How is it that he eateth and drinketh with publicans and sinners? When Jesus heard it, he saith unto them, They that are whole have no need of the physician, but they that are sick: I came not to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance.”


I would like take you on a journey of conversion.  The conversion of a man known as Levi.  The first thing I’d like you to consider is the most foundational part of a man – his name.  The name Levi means ‘attached’ and while that is not so helpful on its own, when we understand Levi was the name given by Leah, the unloved wife of Jacob, when she named her 3rd born(Gen. 30:34), we see some significance! “Oh! Now my husband will love me!”  The fact that Alpheus called his son Levi, indicated his Jewish heritage.  Levi was a Jew.  The name Levi – Attached, has an even more profound Jewish connection when we recall that it was the tribe of Levi which was given over to the Priestly duties – the Levites.  Even the term attached would seem to indicate that this tribe was particularly set apart to the duties and service of the Lord.
----------
As I like to do, especially with these Gospel accounts, I look at the other accounts of Levi’s calling, and we find those accounts in Luke 5:27-32, and Matthew 9:9-13.  We find something quite interesting when we read Matthews account of this.  Please listen carefully as I read Matt. 9:9, “And as Jesus passed forth from thence, he saw a man, named Matthew, sitting at the receipt of custom: and he saith unto him, Follow me. And he arose, and followed him.”   Did you note the name change?  In Mark and Luke we see this person called Levi, but in Matthew, he is called Matthew. This is that disciple.  You might not realize why such a reference is made, so I’d like to read to you MacArthur’s note on the title to the book in his study Bible.  He states, “Matthew, meaning ‘gift of the Lord’ was the other name of Levi. (Matt. 9:9), the tax collector who left everything to follow Christ (Luke 5:27-8). Matthew was one of the 12 apostles. In his own list of the 12, he explicitly calls himself a tax collector (Matt. 10:3). Nowhere else in Scripture is the name Matthew associated with “tax collector”; the other evangelists always employ his former name, Levi, when speaking of his sinful past.”  Why do we see the evangelists hiding Matthew’s identity this way?  And what benefit is there to Matthew in revealing to us who he was, even to the identity of his past occupation?  The answer is in the conversion of a sinner. 


Matthew was a tax collector.  The AV uses the word publican which is more descriptive to the kind of tax collector he was. Quoting the United Nations of Roma Victrix website, “Taxes were assessed…on entire communities rather than on individuals…Tax farmers (Publicani) were used to collect these taxes from the provincials. Rome, in eliminating its own burden for this process, would put the collection of taxes up for auction every few years. The Publicani would bid for the right to collect in particular regions, and pay the state in advance of this collection. (The terms were typically 5 years) These payments were, in effect, loans to the state and Rome was required to pay interest back to the Publicani…In the end, the collectors would keep anything in excess of what they bid plus the interest due from the treasury; with the risk being that they might not collect as much as they originally bid.”  

 J Dwight Pentecost quotes Shepard in describing the two kinds of tax collector, “The Gabbai, collected regular real estate taxes and income tax and the poll tax; the Mockhes, the duty on imports, exports, toll on roads, bridges, the harbor, the town tax, and a great multiplicity of other variable taxes on an unlimited variety of things, admitting of much abuse...”   Now that we have defined the 2 chief types of tax collectors, the Gabbai and the Mockhes – what type do you suppose Matthew was?  Again, let me quote Shepard, “The taxes in Judea were levied by publicans, who were Jews, and therefore hated the more, as direct officials of the heathen Roman power. Levi occupied the detestable position of a publican of the worst type – a little Mockhes, who himself stood in the Roman custom-house on the highway connecting Damascus and Ptolemais, and by the sea where all boats plied between the domains of Antipas and Philip.” 


I looked extensively at the road maps and I came to the conclusion that Matthew was in a pretty plumb position.  His ‘receipt of custom’ we might call a toll booth was indeed located off the coast of the Sea of Galilee on a major highway.  This highway had interchanges to the Kings highway (which linked Egypt & Syria, including Damascus), as well as the road to Jerusalem and the Way of the Sea – referring to the Mediterranean.  He was in a very traveled place and with the road travel, and the sea trade – he had plenty of business! 


Why did Luke & Mark use Matthew’s old name Levi when describing the account?  I’ll tell you why – shame.  The type of man Matthew had once been – was so completely degraded, they couldn’t in good conscience recognize him for the man he once was, so they used his old name, Levi.  Quoting Shepard one final time, “According to Rabbinism there was no hope for a man like Levi. He was excluded from all religious fellowship.  His money was considered tainted and defiled anyone who accepted it. He could not serve as a witness.”   And why then does Matthew not hide his own name – but in 2 distinct places, Matthew 9:9, and later in Matthew 10:3 clearly identify himself as the tax collector?  That is the question we’ll answer.


First of all consider the way Matthew responded to Christ’s command, “Follow Me.”  Mark tells us only that he arose and followed him. Luke adds to this that, “And he left all, rose up, and followed him.”  Think about all the types of taxes he had to exact – the duty on imports, exports, toll on roads, bridges, the harbor, and the town tax – each with their own rates and all the bookkeeping involved.  Since the publican had paid upfront the taxes to Rome – for a 5 year period, he had to keep track of all his activities, so that first of all he would not lose money, and so that he might represent to Rome the actual taxes being taken (in the case that the burden he had previously paid was too great). 


And he left all, rose up and followed him.  You know we say we ought to count the cost – even Christ said the same.  Yet it's only 3 small words – he left all. How much did he take with him?  None of it.  Would you make a 5 year investment and leave all?  We are not told how far into the term Matthew was – but no matter how far – he left all.  And this made a huge splash in the community.  Luke tells us, “And Levi made him a great feast in his own house: and there was a great company of publicans and of others that sat down with them”  Think about the conversations at that feast!  Matthew’s friends were publicans, like he was.  They knew what the cost was – and as good friends they surely tried to get him to reconsider this foolishness.  In addition, some of them surely had thought to themselves – What would be so compelling as to cause a man to cast away everything? 


What indeed!  When a man comes to Christ it changes everything!  This man Matthew had rose up left all and followed him.  He left his bookkeeping records.  He left his booth. He left the money collected.  He left it all!  But someone might say, couldn’t he have at least kept some of the money for the ministry of the Lord, after all, wasn’t he following Christ?  Couldn’t it have been put to good use?


But remember how the Publicani were viewed in the eyes of the religious – even their money was tainted. This man wanted nothing to do with his old life – but still we haven’t answered the question, if Matthew wanted to leave it all behind, why does he identify himself in Matthew 9:9 and 10:3 as the tax collector, the publican? 


And publicans weren’t the only parties present.  Bill Luck tells us what Mark means when it states that sinners were present. “These are people about whom the stigma of sin seemed to adhere. Perhaps they were prostitutes like Mary Magdalene or political terrorists like Simon the Zealot. They were recognizably ‘disinherited’


And what about that name change anyway?  Why doesn’t he go by Levi if he plainly wanted to be remembered as a former publican?  You know that Mark references Matthew as an apostle in Mark 3:18.  Yet when referencing his sinful past he uses his other name, Levi.  So Mark knew of Matthews other name and used it in chapter 3 verse 18.  Evidence shows that Luke knew as well (Luke 6:14).  As a matter of fact the name Levi, only shows up 4 times in all 4 gospel accounts; once in our passage in Mark, twice in the parallel passage in Luke, and one other time in Luke referring to another man entirely. 


Dr. MacArthur tells us in his introductory remarks on the gospel of Matthew, this was “evidence of humility on Matthew’s part.”   One thing he didn’t turn away from – the history of his past.  He knew what he was, and he never forgot that he was a sinner saved by Grace! When the sinner is converted he may shrink from the effects his sin takes upon his fellow believers, but he still takes ownership of his sin. A true believer confesses to God the same way that the publican did when he beat his chest and cried, God be merciful to me, a sinner! (Luke 18:13) 
----------
One of the blessings of the Bible software I sometimes use to help me prepare for preaching, is the inclusion of sermons others have preached on the same passage for which I am preparing.  Inevitably, Spurgeon has something to say on the passage!  The sermon that popped up this time was actually more topical in nature, and he had 4 texts as his basis.


The sermon is #1345, and titled, For Whom is the Gospel Meant? I was blessed by it and commend it to you.  His topic being slightly different than mine, it was a blessing, but most of his insight didn’t ‘fit’ with my theme, the conversion of a sinner.  But I did find this comment which was truly fitting to my theme.

This is Spurgeon, "And what are the commands of the gospel? Repent. But who repents save a sinner? Believe. But believing is not according to the law – the law speaks only of doing. Believing has to do with sinners and with the method of salvation by Grace."

When Matthew left all he did a complete 180 turning from all he once trusted in – His revenue, and the money he had to gain from his post. He even repudiated the past by abandoning to his hurt the entire bid he had purchased on that booth.  There was no refund coming from the Romans.  Matthew was soundly converted.


And as I suggested earlier this act had a profound effect on the community.  I want you to turn in your Bibles to Luke 19.  I’ll read the account of another tax collector, Zacchaeus. Luke 19:1-10, “And Jesus entered and passed through Jericho. And behold, there was a man named Zacchaeus, which was the chief among the publicans, and he was rich. And he sought to see Jesus – who he was; and could not for the press, because he was little of stature. And he ran before, and climbed up into a sycamore tree to see him: for he was to pass that way. And when Jesus came to the place, he looked up, and saw him, and said unto him, Zacchaeus, make haste, and come down; for to day I must abide at thy house. And he made haste, and came down, and received him joyfully. And when they saw it, they all murmured, saying, That he was gone to be guest with a man that is a sinner. And Zacchaeus stood, and said unto the Lord; Behold, Lord, the half of my goods I give to the poor; and if I have taken any thing from any man by false accusation, I restore him fourfold. And Jesus said unto him, This day is salvation come to this house, forsomuch as he also is a son of Abraham. For the Son of man is come to seek and to save that which was lost.” 


First of all let me note to you the passage of time.  When Matthew was converted it was in Capernaum, during Jesus’ earliest Galilean ministry.  The scene in Luke 19 is literally weeks or possibly days before the Triumphal entry and Passion Week.   Probably 18 to 24 months have passed since Matthew left all and followed Christ.  And we read in Luke 19 that Zacchaeus sought to see Jesus.  He certainly had time to think about the reports of one of his own walking away from it all!  Who was this persuasive teacher Jesus?  Some are calling him the Messiah?!  I need to see who this one is.  But he couldn’t – he was too short. Does he let that get in the way?  Not on your life! If Matthew could walk away from possibly 4-5 years of profit at the receipt of custom – this Jesus was someone to see.  Zacchaeus was a chief of the publicani, a rich man.  Indeed!  If Matthew was well to do, consider the wealth of Zacchaeus!   So he put himself in the way – he made every effort to see this Jesus.  And he was not disappointed!  We read of the evidences of his conversion in his standing proclamation to the Lord. 


You see folks, true conversion forces men to consider their ways.  How many other of Matthew’s fellow publicans also left all, if any, we are not told.  But we know this – there was a splash in the community of the publicans, and it absolutely reached the ears of Zacchaeus who lived some 86 miles away.  Matthew’s great feast left many publicans talking for a long time and set Zacchaeus to think about his ways.  You know, by the way, Zacchaeus’ name means ‘pure’ and I can imagine that for some time he wondered about his name and how his lifestyle didn’t fit with a man called Pure. He was a contradiction in terms if any man ever was!  And the Lord opened his heart to repent and believe!


Verse 17 of our passage tells us what Jesus had to say to the charge of eating and drinking with sinners, “They that are whole have no need of the physician, but they that are sick: I came not to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance.


And do you know what folks - we are his ambassadors.  We read such in 2nd Corinthians 5:17-20, “Therefore if any man be in Christ, he is a new creature: old things are past away; behold, all things are become new. And all things are of God, who hath reconciled us to himself by Jesus Christ, and hath given to us the ministry of reconciliation; to wit, that God was in Christ reconciling the world unto himself, not imputing their trespasses unto them; and hath committed unto us the word of reconciliation. Now then we are ambassadors for Christ, as though God did beseech you by us: we pray you in Christ’s stead, be ye reconciled to God.” 


Matthew witnessed to his friends of his new life in Christ.  And Zacchaeus, hearing of the witness was persuaded to listen to Christ.  He then also testified publically to the change Christ wrought in his heart.


What about you?  Are you prepared to share the changes Christ made in your life with others?  Remember the way you were before Christ.  This is important.


Have you compassion for the lost?  Or are you simply offended when they curse?  Do you look past their obvious sin to look at them as one for whom Christ died? Remember what you were like before Christ, and that should help you see them in a better light.  You were no better than them – indeed there but for the grace of God you might be worse!


Aren’t you glad the grace of God was shared with you?  In the Sermon on the Mount one of the Beatitudes is ‘Blessed are the peacemakers’.  Folks – the mark of true disciples is that we are peacemakers – we have the ministry of reconciliation!  I’m not speaking of the spiritual gift of evangelism – I’m simply tugging at your hearts.  We all have the responsibility to share the work Christ did in our lives.   


Dr. Bill Luck has a challenge for us which I’d like to read to you, “As evangelists we are not permitted to “profile.” Matthew was an easy mark. There are many such today. They are the liberal Democrats in DuPage County, Illinois. They are the illegal immigrants in Arizona. They are the Tea Partiers in Washington DC. They are the AIDS patients in the Bible Belt. They are the Palestinians in Israel. They are the Jews in Iran. They are the ex-con in any town. And the question is, are you able to see beyond the social limits of a man and see a potential citizen of the Kingdom of God – a potential co-laboring evangelist?”  


Matthew’s testimony reached the ears of his fellow tax collector, Zacchaeus – 86 miles away!  And the fruit was nearly 2 years later.  Yet think what a joy it was for Matthew to see his brother in crime, become a brother in Christ!   


This alone ought to encourage us!  I’d like to close by reading a familiar hymn about the conversion of a sinner – and I ask you to think back on your own conversion – and pray this week – that you will not sit passively by waiting for a ‘sinner’ to cross your path – but go and share the blessing which was once shared with you!


When I saw the cleansing fountain Open wide for all my sin,
I obeyed the Spirit’s wooing, When He said, “Wilt thou be clean?”


Though the way seems straight and narrow, All I claimed was swept away;
My ambitions, plans and wishes, At my feet in ashes lay.


Then God’s fire upon the altar Of my heart was set aflame;
I shall never cease to praise Him Glory, glory to His name!


Blessèd be the name of Jesus! I’m so glad He took me in;
He’s forgiven my transgressions, He has cleansed my heart from sin.


RefrainI will praise Him! I will praise Him! Praise the Lamb for sinners slain;
Give Him glory, all ye people, For His blood can wash away each stain.


Do you believe it? Go!  Share your testimony people!
Amen.